Discovery Threatens Epstein Money Trail
A judge allowed a key claim under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act to proceed.
The suit alleges FirstBank ran more than 30 Epstein-linked accounts from 1998 to 2020.
A reported $10.9 million transfer into Ghislaine Maxwell’s FirstBank account is cited.
The court kept the case in New York and preserved discovery; one claim was dismissed.
Judge’s Ruling Keeps Core Trafficking Claim Alive
Judge Jed Rakoff ruled on September 25, 2026, that the plaintiff’s main claim can proceed under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act. The decision denies FirstBank’s bid to dismiss that count and keeps the case in the Southern District of New York for discovery. The order also let a New York City gender-motivated-violence claim go forward. The judge dismissed a separate obstruction theory, narrowing the case but leaving the central participation claim intact at this early stage.
The complaint, as described in reports, alleges FirstBank provided banking services linked to Jeffrey Epstein and his network from at least 1998 through 2020. Reporting states the bank maintained more than 30 accounts tied to Epstein, his firms, and associates. American Banker reported that a $10.9 million transfer flowed into an account held by Ghislaine Maxwell at FirstBank, a concrete transaction that will likely draw scrutiny in discovery. These are allegations, not proven facts, but the court found them legally sufficient to test.
Discovery can seek account-opening files, monitoring records, and internal emails. These materials could show whether staff saw red flags that matched federal guidance on trafficking patterns. The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network has warned banks for years about signs like unusual wires, third-party control of accounts, and payments that do not match a customer’s profile. The judge’s ruling keeps the path open to request those records and depose relevant personnel about account oversight.
The class-action path faces a fight. FirstBank argues the claims need person-by-person proof and are not fit for class treatment. If a court agrees, the case could shrink to individual stories rather than a broad pattern. That would limit how much evidence about other alleged victims reaches a jury at once. Law outlets report the bank will press this point hard, which could shape how much of the full financial picture the public ever sees.
https://deepstatetribunal.com/discovery-threatens-epstein-money-trail/