>>2584647

Are you saying the link Q provided to the Congressional hearings on Mkultra is not authentic? Or his link about cell frequencies into your brain, direct programming, and the general methods "they" engage in involving programming our brains? And making FFs. And during the actual digs on these things, there was a lot of gathering of information to verify the programs, to identify the enemy, and what the enemy is capable of, including the histories of the operations and guidelines on Operation Mockingbird, etc.

Even after all the crumbs it is quite apparent that many people still ignore what the information reveals if it doesn't fit in with their current belief systems. Goes right over their heads. Especially when hive thinking and influence is involved.

Hence, the challenge of red-pilling.

I think the 6-8% lost forever needs to be upped. Some will never see even when crumbs are laid out at their feet.

And it is a disservice to jump to a conclusion when the research is cut short because an answer might upset the cart one has filled with unverified items they have invested an interest in.

>>2584838

>Usually when a few independent fringe sources and nuggets from more credible sources agree on the same thing, it's true.

If we've learned anything, it's that this is not true. Carrying out black ops and false flags are dependent on such sources.

Trust no one. Verify everything. Be careful of who you follow.

MSN lessons should be obvious by now.

>>2584647

Maybe the actual organic process of uncovering and verifying information for ourselves is a necessary step in assessing truth. That's the autist way. Don't just assume things.

And Q has done nothing but prepare us and help us to understand how to do that unfolding. Look under the rocks, and dig, connect the dots. And you may find more rocks that need looking under as you dig. Timelines are helpful in revealing a bigger picture.

Do that, and the truth will show.

It's not see/read one thing and then decide if it's true or not.

It doesn't happen like that.

>>2586316

I noticed that too, and those energy weapons with a concentrated beam, like they might be using to start fires.

Pictures of melted cars and glass, while trees still stand, though defoliated and scorched, but haven't been able to verify if it's true. A lot of civilian pictures are out there.

Gotta say, it makes sense.

Star Wars invention. Check this out…

"Standard issue physical destruction"

>>2586575

You know, stop twisting my words.

If someone told you to go jump off a cliff would you? If they told you to blindly follow would you?

How about, look the sky is falling..

Who's your argument with here?

Some on here are pushing "follow me," and you oppose investigation and research first? Too bad. That's a dead giveaway you're either new here and are not an autist, or have ulterior motives using tactics like that.

A QANON Research board is not the proper forum for you to use to get followers or promote and market what you're marketing.

Qresearch and you oppose research.

LOL.

Question everything. Verify everything.

>>2586575

It's obvious you're but hurt

Just by my suggesting research and looking under rocks or pointing out fallacies.

You attribute a lot of words that are not my words.

Go argue with someone else,

Commander.

Not interested.

I too have BS meter

And it's going off big.

>>2586837

Oh, and now you put words in Qs mouth. Don't assume that. You have no legs to stand on, none. Another tactic.

Q does mention this:

Research everything,

Be autist's,

Verify everything,

Know your enemy,

Pray,

MSN & talking points

Trust the plan

And God wins.

You seem to oppose a lot of what Q says, then you use him for your purposes and MAKE BELIEVE your plan is his plan. That's ludicrous.

And it's bthe number one reason I think you're full of shit and programmed to the hilt.

He linked him to specific items, to make a specific point, like his article in NY Times about the QANON conspiracy. There was nothing in the link about extraterrestrials.

That is a leap you make.

It's common knowledge about the secret space program, the argument is what is it, and what's it for?

You make a lot of unfounded conclusions to prop up and say it's got to do with aliens. The ff UFO and advanced space weaponry, on the other hand, was part of the JASON Society's overpopulation solution to kill us off.

It's documented, even in the movies, which Q has constantly directed us to look at, and in the tech connections to Tesla, not reverse engineering of ET spacecraft, that are showing up in declassified documents, but you argue with that. You argue about MKUltra.

You adjust everything to fit into your agenda, and when it doesn't fit, you just say it does, even though Q has made no such comment or link to it.

Then, you go even further and make more assumptions about the plan being the same as your plan, without any such inference from Q.

Anons on main research don't back you on that. That's why you're hear.

Do you see a problem with your logic at all?

>>2587415

In all fairness, there are a lot of people who are believing in UFOs. There's a reason. It's a psyop with evidence in the movies and more. You will not even consider the evidence on NASA, 33° luciferians.

To believe what you believe is to embrace the enemy.

Hanokh explains these gods as evil spirits that can change form and go into humans. One third of the Angels fell to earth, but only 10% are allowed to fuck with us, and that's to test our hearts.

God explains how to arm yourself against them, but here you are channelling them like they're your good buddies. And you won't research that either.

There's a reason they built a luciferian temple at Antarctica and there's a reason we are not allowed to go there. There's a reason astronauts have to be 33° Masons. There's a reason they murdered Admiral Byrd.

What would put people in the hospital?ETs? No.

Live action evil spirits and humans eating humans in sacrificial rituals? And performing massive false flag human sacrifices to kill us all off? Yes. That would do it. Especially given the participants, presidents, kings and WW elites, plus thousands of our own neighbors in America and WW.

That would definitely do it. Especially if your a parent of a missing child. Who could handle that? So we see a Pedo child trafficking approach.

Satan. All the other lies would be small in comparison. So what does common sense say? Is research still needed to actually confirm what the truth is? Or do you just want everyone to plug into your theory and follow along?

I don't jump to conclusions.

And I trust God to the end. But you attack me about that too, even though Q even says to trust God. You make it about some men and say there's nothing left to trust anymore, and then 1, 2, 3, that fast, you reject God instead and tell me I'm gullible and full of shit, while you wait on a "master."

God says the whole world

will be deceived. Wonder what he meant by that?

>>2587636

I have been here since the month of December and have used the same approach, a Q taught approach, a WWH1WGA approach.

Q drops crumb(s), research unfolds into facts and evidence verifying the crumb. If there is something dangling, Q knows, and drops another crumb. If we don't get it, Q knows, and drops another crumb, and so on.

Autists stay in that format. If we go off in the weeds, Q pulls in, or straightens the course. It's very specific and precise. Q verifies that over and over, and his ops haven't changed.

It's not what you're claiming. You leaped out into the weeds by yourself, on your own thought, and keep trying to say Q sent you there. Q didn't say to expand your thinking with this person. You said that. You add things that are not there.

Plus, there's no outside comms.

Comms are tight and controlled.

Sometimes, more than we like, we have to wait on direction. Or another crumb, or news. We were told to watch the news for a reason. It tells us what the deep state is up to, and Hollywood movies are rich in deep state intel, for over 60 years now. You can map it.

>>2590181

I find it odd the letter from 2009 would be released out of the UK. Do you know if it was released here in the US?

Also, the terms "UFO" "extraterrestrial" and any reference to "outerspace" were not used anywhere in the letter, just to clarify. Someone did save the file with UFO in the name, in the UK. Why UK?

And the purpose for developing the tech was for foreign threats, local earth in other words, not threats from outerspace.

Player secrecy was very emphasized, which would allow both the technology itself, and the parties using it, to remain unidentifiable.

That would allow the technology to be used against any nation in the world and it's citizens, including the US, anonymously, even mimicking an alien UFO invasion, as described back in 1957, and in Hollywood movies.

And of course it mentions it will take big money.

The secret players request is alarming.

Who would that be?

1. Are we witnessing the tech in 2018, in the north Pacific, off the coast of Washington State, in incident Q mentioned in his thread about dealing with the unexpected?

Just saying the obvious.

Space Force, ff prevented?

>>2590181

Good find, all cabal swamp creatures.

Ltr from Senate to

William Lynn III, Dep. Sec. of Def. worked for both Obama & Clinton, and Raytheon. Grad. Cornell University.

Under Obama 2/12/2009 - 10/5/2011. Date of ltr: 6/24/2009.

Signed Harry Reid.

Gov. Persons in attachment

(3 not redacted)

William Lynn III

Harry Reid, Nevada

Daniel Inouye, of Hawaii,

(where the other missle was fired).

3 contractor names,

all redacted.