Anonymous ID: 499f5a Aug. 9, 2018, 3:02 a.m. No.2522460   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2482

>>2522444

It still gets some fundementals wrong. and he uses those fundementals to base his opinion.

 

>He wants to believe, but he's been burned before.

And you believe that because he he told you soโ€ฆ

 

funny thing is. If you see his never video's he has only mentioned Q once since this video, but he acknowledges the happenings.

Anonymous ID: 499f5a Aug. 9, 2018, 3:24 a.m. No.2522523   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2578 >>2597

>>2522509

We are supposed to dig?

Maybe your granny doesn't need the details but we do.

That's how we build the parallel construction needed when this goes public.

Yes we are told to trust the plan.

Yes we are told to enjoy the show.

But we have also been told how important our information gathering is, and Q has,m more than once, shown frustration with us.

If what we did was not important to the plan he wouldn't get frustrated.

Anonymous ID: 499f5a Aug. 9, 2018, 3:36 a.m. No.2522571   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2582 >>2593

>>2522541

I'm not arguing he is nowhere near the shill level of CNN or the like.

He's just a YouTuber with a medium subscriber base.

 

I could accept his point of view for the most parts (and as i kinda alluded to earlier, i still watch his videos).

My problem is that i studied, Hypnosis, NLP and Body-language.

And therefore am a bit on the fence when i see these techniques used.

 

>"Or maybe, I just did".

He creates the association in your brain. He doesn't have to tell you explicitly.

Actually this way is worse because he forces you to find similarities your self to answer his question.

Artificially creating more connections than needed to be. And he could have spun the video to focus on the things he wants you to doubt about Q.

 

Nothing is ever what it seems.