>changed history
not necessarily for the better, anon.
DivisionFags. Sheesh.
Dude… your spam didn't include the word "weird". It won't work.
Um, I'm partial to Sun-dried Tomato Alfredo.
But seriously… here is my approach to determining if a source is usuable/acceptable:
-
If, in the past, the source is well-known¹ and Truthful on non-political issues, good to go.
-
If, in the past, the source is not well-known but is Truthful on non-political issues, check that source's source for validity².
-
Other³.
¹ arguably known by most of the citizenry.
² passes note¹ above.
³ lurk moar
Good luck with #2. kek
So… no homo, rite?
#2 is stellar, anon!
Dude, don't tell Aunt Bunny about the door–she might not fall down the steps!