>>2524364 (lb)

I agree that Scott Adams acts now as he did during the campaign. I have to always cut him some slack to see what eventually shakes out.

Thinking about it, I don't see why Q would come up in a meeting between Adams and Trump, anyway.

Another way to look at the situation is that 'Q' probably isn't a real person, so a persona of a 'Q' character could be labeled 'fake'. I think most anons don't believe that at a future point curtains will open on a stage somewhere and Q will walk out, or that Q will be riding on the backseat of an open convertible in the 11.11 parade.

Rather, Q is the information we get and the method of disseminating it. People wearing Q shirts probably don't visualize a person's name and number on the back, rather they visualize that they are part of a new and better system named Q that, eventually, will be the system that is advertised on the back.

>>2524745

>Angry dems.

POTUS putting lawfare on the table?

My job was such that I always ran the risk of being threatened, harrassed and sued by rich people pissed off at the decisions I made (not very critical decisions in the big scheme of things, either). Those decisions that didn't factor in politics or the wealth of the persons involved, since ultimate performance had no relation to those factors.

It's a bitch of a situation for some people, and if the big guy (POTUS) has to deal with it, so will us little guys. Painting the dems with this using tactic is a good move, IMO.