Anonymous ID: 609030 Aug. 9, 2018, 10:21 a.m. No.2525328   🗄️.is 🔗kun

With the revelations of Walden digs, been thinking again about Q's WikiLeaks post 1695. "You may have the site, but we have the source."

 

The Cabal loves controlled opposition.

 

What better way to influence world events than to control supposed "leaks" of classified information?

 

Every major politician in office around the world has a gun pointed at their head daily.

 

I'm not a techy, so this may be too simplistic, but if the NSA has everything, how is a dead man's switch a serious threat? Can they not be chased down and neutralized?

 

The site- what if it's always been in the cabal's hands. Thus, you have the site.

 

The source- what if it's not Assange that is being referred to. What if it's actually the primary intelligence sources- the Cabal no longer has access to?

 

My spidy senses go up when I see Assange being pushed so hard by the DisinfoWar stooges. There has to be an angle.

 

I've felt uneasy about this for a while.