Anonymous ID: 68f7da Aug. 9, 2018, 10:37 a.m. No.2525501   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2525460

Yes.

Maybe not CGI in the strictest sense.

But you can see that they got sloppy over time.

Much more incentive to make a believable picture in 1967 than in 2008.

plus ease of technology lowers the bar to entry meaning less skilled individuals could be employed to the same task.

lowering the overall quality.

 

[TL;DR]

Yes the 1967 blue marble is a work of art. but not because it is real

Anonymous ID: 68f7da Aug. 9, 2018, 11:24 a.m. No.2526003   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6043

>>2525955

Do you have proof of any of your claims in that post?

How do you know?

 

I've tried drugs.

I've seen things, both under the influence and not.

But i don't claim to know what i've seen.

And that brings me back to: How do you know?

Did you read it somewhere or someone told you? How did they know? How do you know you could trust them?

Is it just something you felt?

C'mon dude, you sound like you're smarter than thatโ€ฆ