Anonymous ID: 08bf3d Aug. 9, 2018, 11:43 a.m. No.2526195   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6681

>>2526167

>economics

>scott implies that if the Q information was real, then idea would be to sell it (for money) because it has 'value'. but Q has always been against this.

 

mirrors what POTUS did with his salary.

i couldn't afford to give away a presidential salary, who among us could (or would?)

 

>if true, gov't would shut (it) down

i'm the piece of shit anon who keeps saying

<if false, gov't would shut (it) down

 

and i feel like that little logical paradox was a shot directly at me. now what the fuck.

Anonymous ID: 08bf3d Aug. 9, 2018, 11:50 a.m. No.2526269   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2526255

a shitty fox morning interview stated that manafort was planning to call RR as a witness, put him on the stand, and ask about exactly that.

 

not holding my breath, but would be hilarious.

Anonymous ID: 08bf3d Aug. 9, 2018, 11:55 a.m. No.2526326   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6387 >>6470

>>2526279

i also wonder about the amount of effort it would take to larp this hard, for this long.

 

not just financially, but to not slip up…think about all the people who claim they were in on it…and yet they can't offer a single legitimate piece of behind-the-scenes evidence.

 

and the easter eggs. lord the easter eggs.

Anonymous ID: 08bf3d Aug. 9, 2018, 12:15 p.m. No.2526551   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2526206

i once did a LOT of research on that winchester airfield. it's small, but has international landing rights. it is possible to use that strip to bypass international customs. not easy, but possible.

Anonymous ID: 08bf3d Aug. 9, 2018, 12:18 p.m. No.2526587   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6641 >>6689

>>2526167

> if POTUS confirms Q then scott can very easily say he was wrong and then explain why he was wrong

 

alternate theory because i can't ignore the thought.

 

Q is real

Q whipped us into shape

Q fixed the world

there will be a storm

dust settles

Q disappears

a (you) appears in our mailboxes

world moves on and forgets.

tear.

Anonymous ID: 08bf3d Aug. 9, 2018, 12:37 p.m. No.2526795   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2526681

>>2526679

 

lol.

 

paradox number two.

 

if they don't have insider information, they can't claim to have insider information, because why would they, so by claiming to have insider information, they must have a reason, which means they have insider information, but Q says they don't, so if Q is real, then they don't really have insider information, which means Q is accurate which means they do have insider information, even if it's not the insider information they're implying which means Q's statement is false which means Q isn't real which means there's no insider information to have, which means they don't have insider information…

 

yeah, that was all just one flow. suck it, Nas.