Well, basically, he's feigning adversity because he has to:
Scott's actions towards the end of his video are basically saying "I have sources, and I think Q is shit". That's a logical fallacy called "Appeal to Authority".
Scott Adams literally used "Appeal to Authority" as an argument. Which we all know, isn't an argument.
It's still a logical fallacy regardless of whom he's spoken with recently; confirmed or otherwise. I could say something like:
"Jesus isn't real, and the church is total shit"
If people could verify that I did, indeed, meet with the Pope 4 days prior to making that statement, then the catholic church's membership numbers would plummet.
This is what Scott is pulling on us now. He's trying to wake people up to understanding logical fallacies, and making a case for your claim based on irrefutable proof. The problem with Q is, you really cannot prove it. Oh, sure; millions of coincidences, but that doesn't "prove" it. Just to you, sure, but not a real skeptic.
Think of it this way:
If the proof of Q worked the same in a court of law, there'd be tons of people out there falsely accused of shit everyday.
Correct. Adams didn't name his source because apparently it's sooooo uber top sekrit that it would melt faces and converge timelines.
We all know be means that all 3 of them have POTUS as a source. Possibility that it's someone else, but that's what Scott is intentionally implying. Since that's the case, he's walking you down this "path" that Q is bullshit because all three of them have asked POTUS, and POTUS has (supposedly) told all three of them that "Q" is bullshit.
Which is EXACTLY what I'd do if I were POTUS. Why in the ever-living fuck would I let them take my spotlight when I already have the big reveal planned for a Hannity spotlight 1 week before Midterms?
In the meantime, Q "followers" get a good lesson in how to think like an asshole that demands proof of every-fucking-thing under the sun, to include the sun itself. It's a good exercise, really. Lee Stranahan has been and excellent teacher in this.
Not only do you not know that for certain, you CANNOT produce evidence to the contrary.
POTUS literally has the power to give anyone a secret clearance he wants. All they have to do is meet criteria. He can refer them to the process, and have them an interim in the meantime. Foreign nationals come to the country for the first time ever, and can be "read in" or "interviewed" on a car ride to the place they are about to give briefings to. Yes, this happens with people that are later revealed to be enemies sometimes. You'd be AMAZED at how security clearances are nearly impossible for Americans to get sometimes, but known dignitaries of foreign governments complicit in terrorist activities are given them without pause.
That's a really neat scenario, but you literally haven't proven it. Not sticking up for anyone, but Dilbert man made a ton of claims (we have the same sources, etc.) and no one has determined what the source is.
Your 4chan explanation could fit very nicely into a "Hey look guys, we're talking out of our asses over here while DJT gets something going over there". It might also be that all three have DJT as a source.
YOU cannot prove/disprove that claim; it's just a theory.
I don't think so. I think what he's doing is very important to get anons thinking like skeptics. If you can think like a skeptic, and prove your claims like one, then you'll convince 94-96% of the population.
https://8ch.net/cbts/res/85308.html#85926
https://8ch.net/cbts/res/85308.html#85926
>as for Q proofs it is true Q is NOT conclusively proven
>one must discern and intuit and decide that is true based on the entire dynamic
This is an exact parallel of the story/claim that Jesus Christ is Lord.
Think about it. They call it "faith" for a reason. Look, I'm not going to get into a religious discussion. Just know that what's happening right now is a lesson in "proving your shit" instead of being a mindless follower "just because".
Not an argument.
THIS
is the most intellectually 'HONEST thing that anyone will read all fucking day. You, anon, are a wonderfully honest person.
Just keep in mind that there are those that would argue that the fact-based arguments are the ones that bring the non-zombie types. Having that argument, however, may tear a rift into the space/time fabric.
I love that this quote basically says that "Scientific Fact is Generational". Thank you for this.
Read the rest. I'm saying he's inferring it. I think Scott is being dishonest, but with good intentions.
Also remember, however, that the plan can change/evolve as Q/POTUS see fit without informing us. If a movement cannot stand on its own two feet, now would be the time for POTUS to pull the cord and GTFO.
Think about this right here, right now:
What would be the end result if Q decided to NEVER POST AGAIN?