Anonymous ID: cbb8ee Aug. 9, 2018, 12:54 p.m. No.2526979   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2526928

 

Your question explains exactly why, they count on that logic

 

AJ gets his accounts back in a week or so, in the meantime he has become the reinstated face and leader of the alt-media, in the eyes of normies

Anonymous ID: cbb8ee Aug. 9, 2018, 1:14 p.m. No.2527247   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7322

>>2527134

 

Another one who could have just shut his mouth.

 

If Q is not true, then it implies Potus is a black hat

 

Exactly what Lee Stranahan implies, with the Syria missile attack as main example

 

And that would cost a lot of votes in the midterms, so that republicans lose the house and senate and the deepstate wins by absolute control of the dems.

 

Why do all those "self proclaimed smart" people persue this strategy?

Anonymous ID: cbb8ee Aug. 9, 2018, 1:26 p.m. No.2527392   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2527225

 

Comparisson example mathematically

 

Lets say (just example) that

 

Scott has 8 solid arguments, that are not proof but are in general more likely, lets say 80% chance

 

Then the total of those chances is 1,8 ^8, that gives the number 110,19

 

Lets say there are 100 Q proofs with just 5% chance to be true

 

Then the total of those chances is 1,05 ^100, that gives the number 131,5

 

The second hypothetis in this example has a higher total chance to be true

Anonymous ID: cbb8ee Aug. 9, 2018, 1:32 p.m. No.2527448   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2527405

 

If that's the case someone should have told Potus that CHANS can react in interesting ways when getting attacked with lame and self contradicting arguments) ….meme wise