go straight to
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/with_replies
(must be signed in to see "Tweets & replies"
No fuckery necessary
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/with_replies
POTUS TWEET NOT NOTABLE
>The Tweet by POTUS did not include a "." in front of the "@" making it a REPLY instead of a TWEET. This is actually normal behavior when the first character is a "@".
THIS
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/with_replies
>Q does not exist!
Who or what made the drops then, in order to promote critical thinking? Logic says that the drops didn't write themselves.
To light a fire requires a spark. Who or what wrote the drops to bring the heat?
Re_reading crumbs every day. And before you presume that I asked because I'm worshiping or putting the messenger on a pedestal over the message, I don't, never have in my life. Because that's God's spot. I and my Father are One.
Now, some days crumbs seem like a projection from my own mind, other days, seeming like the result of our collective consciousness. Yeah yeah, WE ARE Q & all that good stuff, the movement is VERY REAL, yet, the origin still has a shroud of mystery. That mystery solved could very well be stranger than fiction.
Why do you presume that I'm not reading that daily? Ok, let's go with your thought which i do share, FUCK WHO Q IS, THAT MATTERS LESS THAN TAKING ACTION BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED. This is a given, you're not saying anything new in that regard. I know this, and have advocated it for the last 9 months. Back to the question, SOMEONE Or SOMETHING DID WRITE THE DROPS< that SOMEONE OR SOMETHING EXISTS up to 2 days ago. So to say "Q does not exist", denies the fact that someone or something wrote. It defies logic to say only "Q does not exist". You may want to rephrase that.