Anonymous ID: 0c2ca7 Aug. 9, 2018, 4:15 p.m. No.2529369   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9470

>>2529317

 

The possible pattern between the three (and many more) alt-media persons is that all got payed from the 20 mln dollar that was reserved for that goal under the Obama signed bill, to control alt-media (picture related)

 

In that case Potus would know that, and a plan would be made where they make a fool of THEMSELVES

 

โ€ฆright before the hammer falls (so they can't claimget credit)

Anonymous ID: 0c2ca7 Aug. 9, 2018, 4:55 p.m. No.2529762   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9805

>>2529525

 

The pattern is that Scott first told "don't trust anonymous sources, like q and sources from MSM"

 

And he ended with "these 3 persons have anonymous sources" so trust us

 

You see the contradadiction in his presentation?

 

There are many more contradictions in Scott his presentation, watch it again, you may learn something.

Anonymous ID: 0c2ca7 Aug. 9, 2018, 5:04 p.m. No.2529849   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9882 >>9977

>>2529805

 

They decided to play so we play back, for the fun of it, no hard feelinz

 

Here another one

 

Comparisson example mathematically

 

Lets say (just example) that

 

Scott has 8 solid arguments, that are not proof but are in general more likely, lets say 80% chance

 

Then the total of those chances is 1,8 ^8, that gives the number 110,19

 

Lets say there are 100 Q proofs with just 5% chance to be true

 

Then the total of those chances is 1,05 ^100, that gives the number 131,5

 

The second hypothetis in this example has a higher total chance to be true

 

Jack tried to convince his mathematical case was true wghile not aplying the same logic to the massive amounts of Q proofs

 

And yes. One time a person on the the tv saying jack to him is coincidence, when it happens 100 times in 9 months it is not an accident anymore

 

โ€ฆthen mathemtical chance logic comes in place, what he tried to use to debunk Q