>>>2537008
NOTABLE AF
Ok. So technically >>2537059 isn't technically a clockfag and BAKERED himself. Nice catch on the ID. But does it prove he's a shill/dig fake??
Got excited about this, anyone else confirm or disprove what suspect anon (ID: b52032) is suggesting in his OP? REALLY late for work now, GODDAMN IT. Thank you and my apologies for not catching dupe ID post!
Indeed. WWG1WGA! Link those proofs, anon. Shills en masse and will bury. Peace.