>>25665

>Shithole

How do we know he even said this?

"according to the people familiar with the conversation"

"according to people with direct knowledge of the conversation"

Oh?

So the NYT and WaPo have never reported blatant lies in the past?

Tell me I'm wrong.

These people are liars and they just saw the president have a good race relations week. Well can't have that can we?

So roll out the fake quotes.

I wouldn't be surprised if this was quietly retracted in a few days and memory-holed.

But IF he said, although it's rather true, it's still pretty bad; but I just don't believe he would say something like that.

Again when has NYT and WaPo told the truth lately? Or ever?

"We" have to do a better job at red-pilling people. Hardly anyone is questioning if Trump actually said what the media reported him as saying.

How are we going to convince them of all that's really going on if we can't break the stranglehold MSM has on their reluctance to question them?

>>25790

No doubt. Not debating that.

What I'm debating is the MSM's reporting of "the facts".

We have a long way to go in red-pilling people about any of this shit if we can't even get people to question this unsourced story.

Maybe he said. Maybe he didn't.

I'd bet money he didn't say it and the NYT/WaPo have to issue retractions in a few days.

Remember all these conversations are recorded.

>>25797

No. Go read the WaPo and NYT time. It's literally "according to the people familiar with the conversation" OR "according to people with direct knowledge of the conversation"

Again, no questioning of this at all and being reported by ALL of the enemy media as fact w/o having tapes, an actual participant in the meeting, etc saying he said it, I would not trust this story.

As @ThomasWictor has said–totally unsourced.

>>25833

It's a distraction, yes.

BUT, it is also proof that we have a long way to go in waking people up.

MOST see the headline and poof–any hint at Trump improving race relations is gone.

>not a good example

Actually it's the perfect example.

How many stories are reported like this that dig into people's minds that we have to deprogram?

It doesn't matter now if NYT or WaPo retract.

It is permanently embedded in people's mind that he said shithole countries, whether he said it or not.

It's the MSM first strike policy.

>>25865

We need to have a first strike policy.

>>25833

>>25865

Note also how the Twitter Shadow Ban policy is poof….out of the headlines.