>>25402 [0] Marker Graphic

There was a question on the [0] Marker last night. Original Post is here:

>>18395

Please see attached graphics for confirmation.

When visiting a Q team post via TOR, you get a UTC timestamp [pic 1], which means you must subtract 4 hours from 22:15:48 to be EST. Time will be 18:15:48. If you don't believe the graphic, launch TOR and visit the link yourself:

1) Launch TOR.

2) Go here: archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/146981635/#147023341

Next graphic [pic 2] shows that Trump Twitter Archive (from their FAQ) does not use UTC, but GMT, meaning you must subtract 5 hours to be EST. They even explain this in their FAQ, which you can visit yourself:

www.trumptwitterarchive.com/about

You may view the GMT at Trump Twitter Archive via the Search function (see all) and bringing up the Tweet and clicking Export (choose CSV or JSON, it doesn't matter). I chose JSON in the last screenshot [pic 3]. How do you verify this for yourself?

1) Go here: www.trumptwitterarchive.com/archive

2) Type in JFK as your Search term.

3) Click Export, then either CSV or JSON.

4) Scan the result in the box at the top.

Sure enough, if you subtract 5 hours from 23:15:39, you get 18:15:39!

Anyone can try this for themselves to verify.

This anon was right all along.

It's a [0] Marker confirmation!

>>18395

>>18395

>>18395

Shills arriving in 3...2...1...

>>25459

Think about who might want to distract you. They're up for me too, BTW.

>>25474

>>25482

Indeed, great work! Got a higher resolution image so we can zoom in?

>>25491

It has been established that Twatter's UTC isn't exactly a science, anon. Who would want to derail you here?

>>25405

BAKER BAKER

Please add this as sauce:

>>25436

Add it to the line:

Is [0] Marker Correct or Not? ->Proof Real >>19465 (You) vs Proof Fake >>19603

Obviously, this goes on the real side. We need more anon eyes on this. So far, (((they))) are trying to highly discredit it.

>>26013

True story. It was a cut/paste mistake. The (You) was me. <sighI wish I could do it all over agin.

>>25405

BAKER BAKER

Please add this as sauce:

>>25436

Add it to the line:

Is [0] Marker Correct or Not? ->Proof Real >>19465 vs Proof Fake >>19603

Obviously, this goes on the real side. We need more anon eyes on this. So far, (((they))) are trying to highly discredit it.

>>26052

You still fail to believe that Twatter has a problem with their dealings of time?

I'm totally with you though. EPOCH is definitely the way to go. I will not disparage that. Everyone should be using it.

>>26103

That's funny! That graphic is from this very board. Check out the misspelling of "White" at the bottom.