Anonymous ID: 35416e Aug. 10, 2018, 4:16 p.m. No.2545969   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5984

Digging on Q's first password…..

 

Wikipedia - Matlock

Premise

The show centers on widower Benjamin Leighton "Ben" Matlock (played by Andy Griffith), a renowned, folksy and popular though cantankerous attorney. Usually, at the end of the case, the person who is on the stand being questioned by Matlock is the actual perpetrator, and Matlock will expose him, despite making clear that his one goal is to prove reasonable doubt in the case of his client's guilt or to prove his client's innocence.

 

United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164 (1974) was a Supreme Court of the United States case in which the Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures was not violated when the police obtained voluntary consent from a third party who possessed common authority over the premises sought to be searched.[1] The ruling of the court established the "co-occupant consent rule," which was later explained by Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177 (1990) and distinguished later by Georgia v. Randolph (2006), in which the court held that a third party could not consent over the objections of a present co-occupant, and Fernandez v. California (2014), where the court held when the objecting co-resident is removed for objectively reasonable purposes (such as lawful arrest), the remaining resident may validly consent to search.

Anonymous ID: 35416e Aug. 10, 2018, 4:51 p.m. No.2546350   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6378 >>6465

>>2546006

 

I just did a search on every bread since the drop, and did not see any association with Matlock the TV lawyer who cross examined a witness, discovering that the witness was the killer, while exculpating their client defendent.

 

This is Q's main motivation, is it not? Trump is the Mueller defendent here.

 

Q is setting up the witnesses to be the Matlock's victim