>So we've got an "a" instead of "e" in first tweet and an extra "i" indicated by use of it's (it is) from seconde tweet
Two missing s also
McCabe wife (should be McCabes)
McCabe text messages (should be McCabes)
>Trump fixes tweet.
Some anon got the answer then.
I just got covfefe so I haven't pieced together what that answer is for myself, but I do know that Trump only fixes mistakes once the real message has been received.
The CI_ comped the last tripcode; The new tripcode is the !! variety…. So the game has stepped up.
Q insisted on the single ! for the longest time, even after being told multiple times that the new hashes were more secure. Knowing that Q has had opsec ingrained, I can only think that that was done purposefully.
I'm suspecting that Q did not make use of the stronger trips so as to "not burn a firewall" (in much the same way a hacke will not burn an exploit needlessly)
I agree, /ourguys/ have been analyzing every failed login with every new trip since cracking them became a thing.
And it does seem that they've been upping security incrementally in a measured way on purpose. I can't speculate as to why they would purposely do it beyond what I've already stated, but that they are doing it (especially in the context of having been informed by CM on several occasions) is evident.
kek, [they] purposely ignore retorts on important shit and you think [they're] gonna listen to you for that?
how adorable.
>If they use a super secure trip it guarantees the salt keyholder(8ch admins) become a target. In this way it takes considerably more computation power which raises the bar to cracking entry probably significant enough to put it out of the league of Antifa, Anonymous, and Media cucks.
This actually makes sense.
> Qteam is EXTREMELY considerate.
I've noticed that about the Patriots as well.
>IIRC !! Has a board specific salt, which exposes CM and possibly BO in the same way - the mitigating factor being that the algo is weaker.
This is why I think they are "holding !!! in reserve" much like a hacker will not burn an exploit until they have to
>anon notices Nickelodeon sexualizing children.
Really, anon. You shouldn't be shocked by any of this, FWIW.
Because spiritual energy matters.
Do you think that [they] do not pray to their own so-called [diety]?
[They] do.
POTUS gets the strength to even do this… From us.
Patriots pray to God for Patriots.
>What am I missing?
We are watching a movie. Everything has already taken place (because opsec), and this movie is really about watching the body fall, and chronicling that fall.
>I doubt the C_A would be interested in cracking the trip. What does cracking the trip allow you to do? Allows you to claim to be, or have been Q.
Why would they turn down the opportunity to invalidate Q?
Does cracking the trips give any insight into cracking boards that Q controls?
Has Q moved to new boards due to attempted takeovers before?
>So who would get value from cracking the trip? Losers like Posobiec, or other pretender posers.
The methodology of the tripcodes is starting to point to the idea that Q is forcing [them] to burn resources by throwing the tripcodes out there as bait.