To clarify, cuz honesty'n'shit:
>>2552708 (pb)
88 was at me, not got.
"Sequential" was the point, anyway.
You want him to pull a Papa John, but the other way around, and because he actually deserves it?
BUT MUH LIBERAL HYPOCRISY!!!!
But "Yes, Co-Incidents"?
>>2544049 (NOT THIS BREAD)
Too, honestly, basic and sticking to the 4am talking point to be originated by the clowns?
Are you fucking retarded?
That was low effort shit-tier.
"Hacked".
Why is it unhacked at the moment?
Wanna dick-wag?
Surrender no quarter.
They haven't hacked it yet… but it's soooooo easy, right?!
"And then they attacked their own attack. DOUBLE CLUSTERFUCK!"
Your wrap up was so poorly constructed that I'm just gonna give to you again as homework, and hopefully the next time you try this shit…
Maybe, just maybe, you won't be so blatantly terrible at what you're attempting to do.