Anonymous ID: 860919 Aug. 11, 2018, 8:56 a.m. No.2553987   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4010 >>4033

>Q Research supports attacking terrible ideas with better ones. We believe the use of force only proves a bad argument. We are researchers who deal in open-source information and informed opinion. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.

 

ok who wrote this it sounds ridiculous randomly up there out of context after the declaration of independence quote..

Anonymous ID: 860919 Aug. 11, 2018, 9 a.m. No.2554033   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4104

>>2553987

replying to myself but

this would only sound good with an introductory sentence like Q research doesn't condone violence (or something similar to that effect)

that way the following sentence would

 

>Q Research does not condone violence. However, we do support attacking terrible ideas with better ones. We believe the use of force only proves a bad argument. We are researchers who deal in open-source information and informed opinion. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.

 

>>2554010

absolutely fren! not criticizing content–more so style – see above ^ the first sentence just seems out of context without the "we don't condone violence" one..but i'm guessing anons/bakers didn't want to outright say that because it's self explanatory?

but coming right after the declaration of independence quote it sounds juvenile..