>>2553987
replying to myself but
this would only sound good with an introductory sentence like Q research doesn't condone violence (or something similar to that effect)
that way the following sentence would
>Q Research does not condone violence. However, we do support attacking terrible ideas with better ones. We believe the use of force only proves a bad argument. We are researchers who deal in open-source information and informed opinion. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.
>>2554010
absolutely fren! not criticizing content–more so style – see above ^ the first sentence just seems out of context without the "we don't condone violence" one..but i'm guessing anons/bakers didn't want to outright say that because it's self explanatory?
but coming right after the declaration of independence quote it sounds juvenile..