>>2557278 lb
yes, anon.
Yes!
>>2556723
Let me add from another anon pb
QR 3202 - Winning Map Explain
Anonymous 08/10/18 (Fri) 08:21:33 bee37c (2) No.2538381
In their infinite wisdom, the United States' Founders created the Electoral College to ensure the STATES were fairly represented. Why should one or two densely populated areas speak for the whole of the nation?
The following list of statistics has been making the rounds on the Internet. It should finally put an end to the argument as to why the Electoral College makes sense.
There are 3,141 counties in the United States.
Trump won 3,084 of them.
Clinton won 57.
There are 62 counties in New York State.
Trump won 46 of them.
Clinton won 16.
Clinton won the popular vote by approx. 3.5 + or - million votes, if you include the dead voters.
In the 5 counties that encompass NYC, (Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Richmond & Queens)
Clinton received well over 2 million more votes than Trump. (Clinton only won 4 of these counties; Trump won Richmond)
Therefore these 5 counties alone, more than accounted for Clinton winning the popular vote of the entire COUNTRY (THINK ABOUT THAT).
These 5 counties comprise 319 square miles.
The United States is comprised of 3,797,000 square miles.
When you have a country that encompasses almost 4 million square miles of territory, it would be
ludicrous to even suggest that the vote of those who inhabit a mere 319 square miles should dictate the outcome of a national election.
Large, densely populated Democrat cities (NYC, Chicago, LA, etc.) DO NOT and SHOULD NOT speak for the rest of our country!
And…it's been verified and documented that those aforementioned 319 square miles are where the majority of our nation's problems foment.
Interesting to say the least.
"Your [vote] is your AMMO, the [ballot box] your RIFLE, every primary is a flank position, every election a hill. Don't sit this war out, FIGHT TO WIN!!!"
Get everyone to think Red this Fall!