So what is everyone here suggesting? That this dude was sacrificed by whitehats for some net benefit? He certainly isn't looking like a Steven Paddock. This dude was very real:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2018/08/11/washington-plane-theft-richard-russell-idd-man-who-stole-commercial-jet/968281002/
And I can't see how this was a blackhat op. To test a FF and see whitehat response time? That's weak.
We need some explanations from Q, because his initial post obviously states this wasn't just some random crazy dude. Q is saying it was was either whitehat or blackhat op:
Autists catch the message?
Think missile.
Do you believe in coincidences?
Q
Q doesn't say who conducted the attack, but he doesn't condemn the attack. This is a bit out of the ordinary. If a blackhat just killed some innocent dude to send a message I'd expect a "These people are sick" line or something similar.
What concerns me is some of the wild speculation I'm seeing on twitter from our side..and since (at this point) it looks like this kid actually did exist and actually did die…I think look like kooks trying to say this was a whitehat op. The blackhat angle is tough to argue for too at this point…
I dunno…I just feel like we need some more explanation from Q on this one