>>2562856 [pb]
Not sure if this posted near end of last Br. gets missed…
potentially
notable
no Beeber blog shots on Wayback Machine
more thickening of the plot.
It's getting more interdasting with each bread.
(I miss books).
>Maria Bartelomo fiasco on her show a few >weeks back when guest started telling how they >were going after Jamie Diamond.
DId that happen?
His story is a fucking joke. Jack and Jill was a more realistic story.
LEO's have been known to overreact. Plus there's cameras.
Well let's see. When you don't consume mass media, you are able to think for yourself, processing information independently and without influence.
I think that's a good short answer.
The book posted here mentions "Halibut", which is even more funny.
if you sink the fucking thing you don't need a distraction.
They're overplaying their hand.
But yeah, dig what the guy in the video has to say about the End Game.
They can't EVER come up with anything original, can they.
A little background on Christine LaGarde (obama cronie).
https://noisefromthetrain.blogspot.com/search?q=lagarde
Exactly. To get in front of the truth. To prevent the obvious from sinking in.
It's what they do best.
Maybe they thought she was going to go all truther on them and had to pre-empt?
Sometimes (Occam's razor) there's a reasonable explanation for things.
It looks a bit purposeful for a cloud.