Anonymous ID: 8382e4 Aug. 11, 2018, 7:43 p.m. No.2563112   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2562980

 

i see that tweet as the govt prompting tesla to accept mil hardware and access points into their security software; tesla perfects the software and then distributes it as an industry standard for self-driving vehicles.

 

People reading between the lines might say tesla is safe because it has govt backing, and musk is pointing this out for Company Stock price security.

 

the technology for self-driving cars is made more 'safe' and standard and the government will have geolocational access points to all self-driving cars…

 

a killswitch? its possible to do now.

 

Food for thought, Idk thats how I read it.

Anonymous ID: 8382e4 Aug. 11, 2018, 7:58 p.m. No.2563284   🗄️.is 🔗kun

missles refer to 6/10 and against russia today.

 

Until im sure, Rich piloted the plane and then died.

Sandy Hook?

 

Im going to be careful, theres a widow somewhere.

Anonymous ID: 8382e4 Aug. 11, 2018, 8:09 p.m. No.2563448   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2563236

I was wondering when this argument was going to be made;

 

'World events are too complex to be trusted @ president, no matter who it is, just look at this guy etc.'

 

We need a SYSTEM

 

But do you know what would not be abolished?

The intelligence community

the intelligence community that decides whats good and acceptable while monitoring you,

 

IC has controlled MANY past presidents; IC WAS the government. JFK caught on after vietnam and bay of pigs.

 

But IC is not good enough either; so we need a System for That.

 

A.I.

 

But its not really A.I. its just so effective that you have the strawman of AI while DS and the likes of roth and Georgia Guidestones run everything while escaping in break away civilization, looking at us like we are sub-human slave monkeys.

 

.,

 

oh sorry, that became some dystopian nightmare novel.

 

But anything that can be done to remove power from the people is being tried.

Remember

The PEOPLE elect their POTUS

 

>>2563253

yeah, theres that angle too haha

>>2563252

no if it could be done tomorrow they would.

Anonymous ID: 8382e4 Aug. 11, 2018, 8:23 p.m. No.2563626   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2563365

you lay conditions out where your opponents respond to you…

 

they are always in response mode; thats why its good to attack rather than defend.

 

This limits possible outcomes into something more predictable;

 

Its why POTUS is aggressive

and why the Ds just attack all day esp at things theyve already done.

 

In chess the name of the kind of game you are playing is usually decided by whites move. Oh thats the Ruy Lopez, White did KBC5 (?) etc.

 

But POTUS is very smart, and this is the tactic.

 

One other tactic that makes me rethink BMueller is feint and cover,

you pretend that your strong allies are your enemies based off something on the surface they are doing and now what they are really doing.

 

maybe, keyword, maybe thats whats going on.

_