You guys were spit balling about this in the last thread.

To me this stolen plane incident was an attempt to FF, do some crazy stuff, and blame the Q movement.

When Q says:

>Think missle.

I'm pretty sure it's a reference back to the Cabal sub and missile launch that was intended to be an FF to blame Korea.

the addition of a Q post saying:

>Iron Eagle

More or less confirms it, a film with a plot involving planes that get stolen. It's a mirror of the Red October references which in turn mirrored the situation going on with the compromised sub.

>>2565284

I think the pilot may have intended to do something much more wild and potentially violent. Since it was foiled it just becomes some tabloid story about a joyride with not nearly the amount of dramatic thrust that the cabal wanted. They clearly are ramping up a narrative of fear and violence to frame Q and the Great Awakening. Some story about a wacky plane ride hardly fits that, and for all we know measures from white hats to contain the story and its connections did take place behind the scenes.

>>2565531

What's your theory then and why is Q directing us to look at this? what's the significance?

>>2565640

So there was no pilot or was he was just an actor? Wouldn't it be easier to just tell the media that the fighters were scrambled on some drill instead of going through this elaborate plane ruse?

>>2565711

Hmm, interesting stuff.

I was thinking the F-15s didn't fire on it, but perhaps the plane was hacked and crashed remotely to help ease the optics of the situation.