I am going to post this here as I could not find MetQ and I may have gone full tin foil hat :)

2/8/2018

I just experienced a timeline shift, jump from one timeline to another while retaining some memory of the other timeline.

Yesterday I went on a rant about Elon Musk heavy rocket that he said it went into the asteroid belt. The Tweet was put up on the evening of the 6th. I 100% remember he said “into” not “to”. I screenshotted it and saved it. I was triggered enough by the thought that the rocket went over the speed of light by already passing Mars that I went on a rant and actually did the math. Then yesterday afternoon for some reason I saw the tweet someone else pasted and it said “to”. I then went to Musk twitter to screen shot and save to show he changed his tweet which I did. But when I checked my previous copy it also said “to” not “into”.

I know this is silly. And yes I could have read it wrong. That is the most logical explanation – other that I 100% remember “into”. Also that “to” would not have triggered me to do math :), as it implies trajectory not already there.

It reminds me of the time my daughter went on a rant for days about how they had changed the name of the character in a major book she had read and only some people remembered the original name. At the time I also chocked it up to she read it wrong.

How many other people have experienced this phenomenon?

The phrase Future defines Past is also relevant here. In a Multiverse with infinite timelines, each subtly different; then not only would our past actions create our future, but our present/future also defines our past. Any anomalies would point to a shift in timeline. In a multiverse your perception is generally in one timeline and memories and the occurrence of events usually align. But if there has been a recent shift to another timeline/parallel universe then the memory of the old may vary slightly. Over time this usually corrects itself. Thus the future you move into defines the past you remember. The above is an anomaly situation where the person still remembers the old timeline and is left the odd man out of the collective memory usually for that single event.

Keep that in mind when little oddities happen.

Other peoples theories first:

https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse

https:// io9.gizmodo.com/if-this-theory-is-correct-we-may-live-in-a-web-of-alte-896376482

Now Mine

The Multiverse/Timeline theory:

Basically it is the theory there is a universe with its own timeline for every possible event/action from the beginning of time until the end of time. Thus there are infinite yous branching back and splitting from you every instant until you were born (ie one of them never drew a first breath). You can look back and remember your life and your decisions to know who you are, but with other choices you would have been a different person. Future Proves Past. The you of 2 days ago is proven by the you of today, and the you of two days ago and the choices you made in those two days created the you that you are today.

An alternate you that made a different decision 3 days ago disproves the you that you remember two days ago; as they do not remember that you of two days ago because that you never existed their timeline. This is the how what Q said works – Future Proves Past.

One of the ways to visualize this is a tiled tv or video screen with a different similar image on each tile; and each tile is an instant in time for all of time. Now behind each tile cascaded behind is an infinite number of windows of all possible events at that moment in time. Let’s take it one step further; if you spun that image 90 degrees out of the TV it would show how each event is connected to each and every other moment in time and how it affects them.

Can those multiverses be interacted with or perceived or experienced? If so then time effects would work both ways as it would affect our past by changing it. Do those multiverses influence or local universe? Could the fractal dimensions of physics actually be these multiverses perceived not 90 degree but as say 0.333 degree or 24.8 degree?

If you draw and X and Y axis on a piece of paper they are at 90 degree and you have length and width. But if you want depth you must draw and axis at 45%. Technically that axis is a 0.5 degree dimension as it is not set at 90 degree. Yes I understand this is just a tool we use to perceive 3-D in a 2-D plane, by doing this we can shift our perspective to see a cube in a 2-D drawing. Think about that; we can use a partial dimensional view to visualize a higher dimension. Most of us do not know how to do that beyond four dimensions. Partial or Fractal dimensions are basically dimension seen/perceived at a 90 degree angle. Try this draw axis’s 6 or 9 or 12 of them equidistance’s from each other and gaze at the page; you can choose which two or three jump out at you that are the X, the Y, and the Z.

It has been proven that these fractal dimensions to influence our 4-D reality from static to how ferns grow. So far it is kind of random for us to find the influence and interactions, and some just call it a mathematical representation. I do not understand the higher math but it seems like all of a sudden in math a multidimensional (fractal) equation just coalesces or clicks into a 4-D answer and it answers a real life question.

What If our tech is beyond what we think? Physics changes all the time, Newton did, Einstein did and from that one we got nuclear power and bombs. What ifbehind the scenes they found a new way to look at the world that allows dimensions to be spun and placed in the way to make length basically irrelevant (a fractal dimension), or time? Distance would eliminate any problem with instantious travel – ie a space fold. Time would allow big changes in events globally and no consequence and it just changes entire timeline.

The Fractal math would need to include the "probability" that an event to become 4-D to know how to spin the axis so you could coalesce it into 4-D.

Thinking about space folding there would be two separate issues I feel. One is calculating the fold from one point to another and how to spin the axis so they are right next to each other and all the intervening space folded into a fractal dimension. The second is to make sure the object you want to move is not folded as well. I do not know what would happen if you folded the object into the fold and then unfolded it on the other side.

A zen master if asked how do I get from here to there master? Would say bring there here.

Now how to do that in physics? Gravity sink? Mass created divot in space time we perceive as gravity. Amplify? Too much energy. Easy to visualize but how to ..

Or just change the object location perhaps? Not fold just redefine in the matrix of EM world where the object is? I am just spitballing :)

Spitballing again

How do you rotate an axis? Mentally easy. Physically? Well you can turn the object. You can move your point of view by moving yourself. Those two are of an object. But the system? How does nature do it? hmm?

Again nature does it by mass and gravity or velocity that changes mass. Hmm? And we are back to the warping of space time and if we can do that manually.

Simulated mass? What would that be? Antimass - pulling from the outside? Well if you knew the fractal pattern of that part of spacetime and could use small amts of energy to push key points in the fractal pattern you could dramatically change the formation of spacetime in that area. The butterfly effect.

Why do I say the fractal pattern of spacetime? Well my theory is that is the framework down to base particle level. I feel matter is just very complex fractal patterns of EM energy (or more basically - a standing wave pattern

there is someone else here?

So if matter is just a complex standing wave pattern, how do you move that pattern from one location to another?

Ahh location is not defined!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Need that answer!!!

What is location?

What is here? What is There? How are the different and why?

Perception is the easy answer; but that is an internal answer and what we are looking for is an 'external' answer.

Maybe that is why in Dune it was actual being that moved the ships with their minds.

Location.

a locus, a point, a focus,

Back to normal physics - a location is a point in the universe. Thus if you had it all mapped you could define the points figure the makeup of the fractal pattern and modify it in theory.

Unlikely.

But if you know the location of start and finish you probably could modify the code to the location of the object in the universe if you could DNA map the fractal pattern and find the location DNA gene

That actually has some potential I may have to think on that one.

Knowing the Location Marker in the fractal pattern is not enough you would need to know the meaning as well.

Why am I relating to DNA? Because it is all made from the same pattern.

Well I need to clear off the snow tomorrow

This shit better not keep me awake tonight :)

>>313143

Yes I am aware. That is why I said the logical thing is that I misread it. The event and Q always saying Future Proves Past just triggered the thought stream and brought up previous studied options on how the universe works.

>>313604

I have a very cursory knowledge of those projects. As I recall they were before the discovery of fractal geometry, chaos theory, and the Mandelbrot set. As physics advances so does math (except in our high shcools :)).

>>313604

It would be interesting to visually see the fractal EM field of a Tesla field. What would a fractal of an EM field look like? That is an interesting question. What are the itinerations off the arcs of an EM field?

The golden Mean seems to be the way fractals move between dimensions.

I will have to think on how the golden mean is connected to the EM field

others views golden mean and EM field:

https:// www.goldennumber.net/energy/

https:// www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/01/100107143909.htm

I am sure there are others.

This article does confirm they are experimenting with how applying EM fields alter matter EM fields and how that relates to fractal geometry etc.

I will have to research if electron orbits are golden mean/Fibonacci related. Hmm?

Then if the electron orbits are related see if they Schrodinger cat type probabilities of where the electron is are fractal geometry related and see if the probability relates to the iteration (fractal dimensional step)

Base info to go on:

https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_orbital

https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio

LOL my brain may not be big enough to understand this :)

Wow even just at the Hydrogen atom level they had to use equations that involved calculating based upon the use of the surface of a 4-d hypersphere to get accurate prediction of where the electron would be.(after 1979)

These graphical representations are why this stuff is fascinating to me. This hypersphere thing they needed to use in 4-D space where every point on the picture is the radius and the same distance from the center basically shows how much our space time is warped.

>>315211

You know more than me on that

Can you please explain?

But I kinda see it.

The use of dimensional axis to create power?

That is an interesting concept and yes the way the axis turn and twist it does kinda look like the way a generator coils are twisted. Also like modified Fabiconni

But if global axis are put in a pattern to create a dimensional EM field :), that would mean that field emminates out into other dimensional fields?

If that is true

IF THAT IS TRUE

that is the CONNECTION between timelines in the multiverse.

Interesting - and thanks.

I have to note here that these images showing how a simple multidimensional axis warps do not include any mass to warp the axis

:)

and you thought this would be simple :)

it will be in the end :)

Trust me all those massive crazy equations I have been seeing on Wiki and elsewhere are just Swinging Wild Ass Guesses with complex math.

yes they work at times. But also fail at times. But they give us hints.

some dude in the 20's or 30's was able to create a hypersphere in his head.

I took 50-60 years or more to be able to make a decent graphic.

Hypersphere - all points are equidistant from the center.

While I look at that I understand.

It in this hypersphere in 4-D the center moves -from center to the edge. But it moves in the fabbiconi/golden mean to the edge and back.

And this is the way we can conclusively define where the electron probability in the Hydrogen atom is?

Anyone else get the significance?

That would mean that 4-D axis is a fabiconni sequence. :0

IE fractal

What the hell did I say in the beginning? LOL

partial dimensions

But what we see in Mandelbrot are just the axis

LOL get it?

The next mathematical thing for the mathfag is to figure the change of the iteration. What is the change in distance, spin and angle? Start 2-D then 3-D - and ohh crap it probably goes more - does it ever end - well hopefully it circles back - check that.

Did I win my tin foil hat award?

I feel the Mandelbrot is the view from outside and there is a different one from inside.

How can those two be the same?

Well think back to the way Fabiconni did it with the 4D sphere.

Axis are not lines

Could they be seen as curves or circles?

Thus if what the last response I got is true. That the very creation of axises create EM (or something like that) energy then the power would emminate out in a EM pattern and affect the matter around it and possibly eminate into the fractal dimensions. If in fractal that would create energy transfer between the dimensions.

Sorry my spelling is so bad my spell checker is confused :)

Think I have always thought axis can be bent. I have long accepted they can be circles. But bent like a motor coil yes probably

What would happen then? Well perhaps it is not the axis that creates the EM energy but the objects within that axis? HMM?

Dimensions are hard we know the first 2 :)

one more lol 4 D

basically once we move beyond 4-D things start curving and warping. We have a much harder time understanding.

I need a mathfag that can help

I am here

And no other thread is ready for this stuff.

LOL

>>316931

So basic motor stuff?

With how it works.

Got it.

sorry i was being a Bitch in general LOL

so many morons

and many at just 10,000ft

But you understand that you can show that a motor works the same way as a hypersphere in 4-D does not make the connection between the two right? To me it shows the fractal underlying basis of the universe but may convince no one.

hi

Motor would show real world application but it may take a mathfag to show the motor works from power across dimensions.

Of I may just be Tin Foil

Fractal and physics stuff especially geometry is something we all get inherently but making the connections scientifically and mathematically seems to be harder.

I just had a thought on the golden mean.

it is a torus.

i feel many axis are circles. Thus when a mean moves past the circle it is mulitidimin. if it reflects it is within the dimension. Again Future defines past.

it is kinda fun being tin hat :)

This is the one that shows the reflection from the boundary that an axis will take.

Hmm i need to regroup.

wow general will get the whole site shut down for conspiring violence

Wow

I have no idea who cracked the trip code.

a bunch just doxed themselves IMO

Tone way off - showing IPs?

Cracked

>>315938

One could be a memory from another timeline. Well that is one option

My current train of thought on axises is that the hydrogen atom electron orbital may be a projection of our physical axis. I am not sure if they would be the clouds or the black lines. But our world would relfect how it constructed at this base level in my opinion

Here are the axis of the hydrogen atom based on cloud forms of the electron fields. Note some of them are circles. Are the circles partial/fractal dimensions?

I asked

Q said build a timeline

Know Q also said Future proves past

Did the Q that knows the science intel ask us to build a timeline where Q and Trump win?

Did Q ask us to create a whole new timeline in the multiuniverse or just access one that is far from the local probability? I has to be bring one from far to near certain probability. My world view will not allow the other option.

a new revelation

Musk

into - with Trump

to - against or disinfo

you all can see the black axis I do not have to show them

the do put the cloud in a quadrant.

Also understand that circle dimensions may be dimensions in polar quadrants - a line becomes an ellipse or circle. But it may be dimensional.

>>331015

no promises I just follow that I find.

>>331497

Truth

I just follow my ….

what the fuck is it

mind

lead

path

orders

I have no clue

>>334833

Thanks

I was beginning to think I was just spinning my wheels.

Presume we are existing on the surface of a 4 dimensional hypersphere like the equation for hydrogen electron orbit.

Then do the math with that perspective. Would it shift the fractal dimensions to full dimensions?

Would those curves in the fractal be lines?

Ok I will play

What if every point in our external physical universe (the bubble) is a Einstein Rosen bridge that scales down into the fractal dimensions and connects to one or all other points.

Note we have some evidence we live on the surface of the 4-D hypersphere and it may be the mandelbrot set we see is the warped reflection of the image in 3.