The Q post about NDAs >>2570214 seems more about the NDAs that FBI agents had to sign for the Hillary e-mail investigation in 2016.
As a citizen, I don't buy the idea that the government can ask a person to sign away their freedom of speech. An individual can choose to do so in the private sector in a private contract, but I don't accept that in the government if we are going to have openness, sunlight, and truth. If there is anything happening in the WH that does not fit that description, I would want there to be an avenue for employees to make it known to the public. Obviously this does not apply to classified info.
Seems the consensus interpretation is that the drop refers to the WH leakers and media. I think it is the NDA issue and freeing up the FBI agents to testify. When the media says that Omarosa should not be held to her NDA, then Trump can free the FBI agents from their NDAs.