Blacksheep anon here:

See the blackmail?

We've been educated in the art of control, and how people are controlled. You can

pay them, but the real deal is to both reward and coerce, and we know what the

coercion looks like.

Lately, 'journalists' have been given high positions who publicly express 'bad'

opinions. Why? A big daddy looks for the capacity to take orders from a good boy

or girl. How much risk they are willing to take for how little in return. The more

risk, the less in return, the better. SJ took some risk, and what was her expectation?

She knew she was going to get a job at NYT? Nope. Good girl, takes risks, expects little.

Black woman who claims Russian hackers: did her blog have risky quotes? What

could she expect in return? Good girl who does what daddy says. Divisive rhetoric

iterators.

If the good boy or girl doesn't do what daddy says, easily fired because of "past

regrettable behavior". See the blackmail?

Twitter accounts of famous people containing dark humor, weird pictures of 'lost'

articles of clothing. See the blackmail?

Kidnappers take child.

Amber alert told to ignore.

Article of clothing, evidence, documented.

"Thought leader" post pic on twitter.

Do they have control? Even if the crime never happened, even if it's a lie sold to

thought leader to control him, does it work?

"You are progeny of notorious dictator" told to current political leader. Even if

false, does it work? See the control, see the mind games.

See true history of man kind as history of social engineering.

Pay attention, think, solve the puzzle.

Cheers fellow patriots.