>>256800

You are missing the quite possible reality that Mueller has flipped (yes you're correct in how guilty he is across the board) and he is the perfect mole because (((they))) don't suspect him. He has the dirt on EVERYBODY, and for the year this BS has gone on about Russia!, Sessions and Horowitz have been racking up indictments in the shadows. HAHA Trump is beating them at their own game! Look at the memo release yesterday. Shows nothing we didn't already know, BUT is has the media in a whole knew frenzy arguing over nonsense while Sessions and Horowitz just keep sliding along and compiling evidence against them all while Mueller does magic tricks for the camera and keeps their focus on what doesn't matter.

Trump's Team is beyond brilliant.

Be patient Grasshopper . . .

>>257421

Not to long after this 7th heart transplant !

Being a rich globalist has it's rewards ! And then die anyway. ha ha ha

>>257475

Yes, this ^^^^^^. Daddy Bush taught Clinton who was smart enough to learn. BHO was not, he fucked everything up for (((them))).

Bushs are a generational dynasty starting with Grandpa Prescott -Daddy HW -> Boy George. Thank God we will not see the Clintons accomplish that same crooked feat.

>>257305

THIS ^^^^^^^ is why Q said to start pushing #InternetBillOfRights !

When will you all figure out the children playing WAR in their 'room', are NOT the place to seek direction?

Q post #60, the only direct instruction from Q has gone completely ignored ! I can't trend anything my myself !

By the time they wake up, it could be to late.

>>257620

Evidently, I utterly failed to call attention to the fact that they aren't promoting that hashtag.

In post >>>/GreatAwakening/60 Q directly said to push #InternetBillOfRights. They didn't, haven't, aren't, and seemingly won't.

If they were other than Glowing Niggers, they would have made a correction in over a week! No ? Somebody please explain this so it makes sense.

They build ice cream cones, play war and carry on nonsensically, but they don't follow directions. I couldn't careless about what they do, but a LOT of anons here look to them like they are sitting atop a mountain of knowledge! I don't see it.

Why is Q here?

To give direction.

What good is that if it is ignored?

>>257725

I image pigs aren't kosher because in the Bible they are referred to as other than food. There are listed as something to NOT eat. Biblically you shouldn't be eating a pig to start with. No surprise you won't find it Kosher.

Deuteronomy 14:​​8 And the swine, because it divideth the hoof, yet cheweth not the cud, it is unclean unto you: ye shall not eat of their flesh, nor touch their dead carcase.

>>257748

If you perceive your job as serious, get with the program. #InternetBillOfRights needs to be at the TOP of the list on EVERY Bread that posts your combined output.

You guys are theorizing about making the most effective plan.

Q already has a plan. He KNOWS what is coming and what's going to happen.

I DO NOT mean to belittle your efforts, you're doing a fine job except for this one thing that is unfortunately, of major importance.

All you need do is update the post(s) that get baked into the bread so they are perpetually visible. Don't require a straw poll, debate or anything else. Just do it. If somebody bitches about it, just tell them to argue with Q, you are just doing what you were instructed by HIM.

>>257925

Here is the LATEST EXECUTIVE ODER:

Presidential Executive Order on Protecting America Through Lawful Detention of Terrorists

National Security & Defense

Issued on: January 30, 2018

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Findings. (a) Consistent with long-standing law of war principles and applicable law, the United States may detain certain persons captured in connection with an armed conflict for the duration of the conflict.

(b) Following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) and other authorities authorized the United States to detain certain persons who were a part of or substantially supported al-Qa’ida, the Taliban, or associated forces engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners. Today, the United States remains engaged in an armed conflict with al‑Qa’ida, the Taliban, and associated forces, including with the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria.

(c) The detention operations at the U.S. Naval Station Guantánamo Bay are legal, safe, humane, and conducted consistent with United States and international law.

(d) Those operations are continuing given that a number of the remaining individuals at the detention facility are being prosecuted in military commissions, while others must be detained to protect against continuing, significant threats to the security of the United States, as determined by periodic reviews.

(e) Given that some of the current detainee population represent the most difficult and dangerous cases from among those historically detained at the facility, there is significant reason for concern regarding their reengagement in hostilities should they have the opportunity.

Sec. 2. Status of Detention Facilities at U.S. Naval Station Guantánamo Bay. (a) Section 3 of Executive Order 13492 of January 22, 2009 (Review and Disposition of Individuals Detained at the Guantánamo Bay Naval Base and Closure of Detention Facilities), ordering the closure of detention facilities at U.S. Naval Station Guantánamo Bay, is hereby revoked.

(b) Detention operations at U.S. Naval Station Guantánamo Bay shall continue to be conducted consistent with all applicable United States and international law, including the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005.

(c) In addition, the United States may transport additional detainees to U.S. Naval Station Guantánamo Bay when lawful and necessary to protect the Nation.

(d) Within 90 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Director of National Intelligence, and the heads of any other appropriate executive departments and agencies as determined by the Secretary of Defense, recommend policies to the President regarding the disposition of individuals captured in connection with an armed conflict, including policies governing transfer of individuals to U.S. Naval Station Guantánamo Bay.

1 of 2

2/2

(e) Unless charged in or subject to a judgment of conviction by a military commission, any detainees transferred to U.S. Naval Station Guantánamo Bay after the date of this order shall be subject to the procedures for periodic review established in Executive Order 13567 of March 7, 2011 (Periodic Review of Individuals Detained at Guantánamo Bay Naval Station Pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force), to determine whether continued law of war detention is necessary to protect against a significant threat to the security of the United States.

Sec. 3. Rules of Construction. (a) Nothing in this order shall prevent the Secretary of Defense from transferring any individual away from the U.S. Naval Station Guantánamo Bay when appropriate, including to effectuate an order affecting the disposition of that individual issued by a court or competent tribunal of the United States having lawful jurisdiction.

(b) Nothing in this order shall be construed to affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful permanent residents of the United States, or any persons who are captured or arrested in the United States.

(c) Nothing in this order shall prevent the Attorney General from, as appropriate, investigating, detaining, and prosecuting a terrorist subject to the criminal laws and jurisdiction of the United States.

Sec. 4. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

DONALD J. TRUMP

THE WHITE HOUSE,

January 30, 2018.

>>258004

They were talking about that last night on either Hannity or The Ingram Angle. Seemed like a pretty stupid stunt to this anon (they are good at those).

They were talking like there is NO question that he will be charged for that as well. Many possibilities there, evidently.

>>258052

That is a standard closing paragraph to most things Gov related. This keeps a person from going after individuals and others responsible for actions the Gov takes that might later be deemed incorrect.