Anonymous ID: 973955 Feb. 3, 2018, 7:37 a.m. No.257456   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7487

>>256879

 

You're probably right on this ... wave #2 will probably address GMO foods / Monsanto, chemtrails, big pharma, fluoride in the water, and everything else that can be lumped into that arena. Without completing wave 1 first, wave 2 will never be feasible.

Anonymous ID: 973955 Feb. 3, 2018, 7:41 a.m. No.257485   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7492 >>7497 >>7524 >>7641

Maybe we should be looking closer at the bans last night. They just don't fit any pattern or rationale that we've considered so far.

 

The million dollar question: would Q have the ability to ban people in here? I would imagine so.

 

This was not a rogue mod doing it. The subject matter would have been consistent and much more widespread than it was. No red messages were placed and all the bans were 24 hours or less. This was not malicious. There had to be a reason for it. A calculated one.

 

Maybe this was a Q drop without dropping.

 

We need to start assessing the posts that triggered bans. I only know of one that was about Mueller.

 

In addition, the references to other messages were frequently greened out when the message was still posted. That could have simply been an issue of needing to refresh my page.

 

Is there any way we can quantify the posts that triggered bans?

Anonymous ID: 973955 Feb. 3, 2018, 8:03 a.m. No.257664   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>257566

 

I get the impression that right now the Q group is up to its ears in a life-or-death struggle that is high-speed, higher danger, and unfolding now. We are Twiggy waiting at the gas station while Jake and Elwood are making their way back to the Chicago loop with 500 or so cops on their tails.