read crumbs anon, 16 year plan
if that is the real person I have one word to sum up the relevance of that cunt to the world…Garfield
Namefags are generally thought of in a bad way and they should be. What we are doing here is not for fame and attaching a name to anything immediately implies ownership. For example, I am the first one to raise the name Bill Binney and to include the background on him, what he does, and how he is likely helping the POTUS.
I added this information to the spreadsheet in the very beginning of all of this. No one knows that it was me or even who I am and that is the point. The focus is on the information not me as an individual or what I am bringing to the table. The same can be said for the planefags, the digfags, the memefags, twatfags and every other fag on this board. This is not about one person and megafag refuses to help without the glory so no matter what they produce no one will even humor it because of that.
If meganamefag wants to genuinely help, how easy would it be for them to just post anon? Well have they? The motives are clear since they refuse to stop the namefag shit.
I am hesitant with anything Congress related. These are the same people that played this corrupt fucking game for decades before Trump came in an shit on the board. Let's not all of the sudden treat these liars, thieves and traitors like they are on our side. If the political winds change tomorrow they will all be right back to putting cock in ass
Don't get me wrong anon, I am not thrashing on what you did. I was merely pointing out the observation and reasoning why namefags are generally not well thought of and dismissed outright.
I honestly don't know where I land on the meganon shit but the namefagging bothers the shit out of me