>This Twitter acct was referenced for a very specific reason.
>HOLDS many 'questionable' messages from people of power/influence.
>These accounts are run by BIG NAMES.
>Q
That may be true. It would be good to provide actual evidence of wrong doing, not just pointing out sick jokes in bad taste. I see worse stuff right here on Q research.
We are supposed to be dealing in fact based evidence only. Shock jock tweets mean nothing.
<Did you see the pitchfork mob you sent there?
I could hardly find one of their tweets.
Embarrassing as fuck. So much so that I felt it necessary to make it into a meme.