So I should say that Ill do more lurking and less talking, more digging. Ill leave you with this:
Q can not be held liable for what anons do or dont do; its a ridiculous argument to make.
That said, the response from anons to twitter bomb [] was Easy to predict.
This gives ammunition to the enemy; posting bullet memes , and guillotines can be seen as a threat in this day and age (Europe already fell, Apple is in china, FB is regulated by UK standards @ soon. I suspect insiders predicted, knew legal decision, and shares fell. you see the pattern.)
So is this a good thing? does qresearch get the rep of unhinged bullies? Dangerous?
Censorship game is full on; they (MSM + Narrators) only need a small percentage of agreement, and then convince the majority that the small percentage IS the majority @ qpost
BUT
There is another viewpoint to consider; the best way to show anons as unhinged internet bullies @ twitter bombing is to really have nothing to hide and prove it.
If Q knows theyre corrupt or pedophiles, and has the info; then they cant defend and anons are highlighting it. We will find it if its there; theres probably 5 of you working on it now.
@Truth to light.
I was deeply rattled by Audio of Pilot Russell; Not even angry at him. The ambiguity of Q's post >>2556723 needs clarity:
Was this a message to Q , that we wouldve naturally seen in the news, and highlighted by Q; was it a FF where the pilot chose a different course of action?
MK Ultra?
Anon reported that a widow grieves; this is why im mindful of speculation; think Sandy Hook. CNN fake green screen doesnt = fake event @AJ.
Was it a "show" with one layer of it being plane remote guided as a missle against some secret facility? or sent as a message? I really dont think so.
We can note that missles in nearby area mysteriously fired @6/10 around the time POTUS goes to NK Summit. I have not verified; enough anons said as much. By my count that is 3 misslie events, last one being @ NATO/Russia yesterday.
Q to the extent able, should clarify; esp. Pilots death per official story. "THIS IS NOT A GAME" Remember?
Other possibilities all entertain Larp theory; and an objective mind should look at that, because that is the kind of mind that provides Real Q proofs instead of a series of wacked out works of loose association. Im not going to post those; Ive already asked about kill_rogue having identified that KR references Satan months ago.
'In the end the decision to know will be yours'
As the scenarios play out, there are options either way and WWG1WGA = "No one above another" per Q.
Just think about it
@Lurking
_X
And no weapon formed against you shall prosper.