Anonymous ID: afc257 Aug. 12, 2018, 5:04 p.m. No.2575631   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5681 >>5699 >>5701 >>5747 >>5759 >>5823 >>5914 >>5943 >>6014 >>6023 >>6149

>>2575566

 

planefag here

 

This is the spoopy shit I was referring to.

 

All the previously posted tracks were for the Sherriff's plane and NOT the Q400 - N449QX.

 

So far I've not seen an actual track which means the transponder was likely turned off and the plane could have landed somewhere else without any tracking.

 

Not saying it did but has anyone seen any report that shows actual crash footage on pedo island. All I've seen is some smoke which could be from a missile strike.

Anonymous ID: afc257 Aug. 12, 2018, 5:10 p.m. No.2575708   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5753

>>2575636

 

Can other planefags comment on this?

 

I'm a private pilotfag and know that most radar systems track the transponder and not the actual plane itself. I believe this applies to the commercial flights as well.

 

If this is true and Russell did not turn on the transponder then we would not have a flight track.

Anonymous ID: afc257 Aug. 12, 2018, 5:13 p.m. No.2575749   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5812

>>2575681

 

I know military radar tracks everything but the civilian do not. there would be too much clutter on the screen for the air traffic controllers to handle.

 

That's why a mod C transponder is required in all major airspace around airports like SEATAC.

 

It's my understanding that all transponders have to be turned on - including commercial airliners - and programmed to the current flight number.

 

Without it the plane could not be tracked by civilian radar - but military could

Anonymous ID: afc257 Aug. 12, 2018, 5:16 p.m. No.2575785   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5893

>>2575738

 

agree

 

The trained pilot would also know how to turn the transponder on and off and what the transponder is for - tracking.

 

So my theory is that IF there was a pilot - he was trained and knew to keep the transponder off so he would be a distraction while the F15's took out a spoopy site on pedo island.

 

then the plane simply lands in a remote location possibly a military site.

Anonymous ID: afc257 Aug. 12, 2018, 5:29 p.m. No.2575936   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6113

>>2575829

ok - it's possible there's some fuckery with the tail number and the real plane.

 

But who has an actual flight track other than the sheriiff's plane?

 

My point is there doesn't seem to be an actual flight track that ends in the "crash" so we need to look for other possibilities.

Anonymous ID: afc257 Aug. 12, 2018, 5:30 p.m. No.2575947   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5971

>>2575849

 

Unless there is something spoopy about this flight and the military knew the transponder would be off.

 

How else to explain there seems to be no flight track of the "ill-fated" joy ride.

Anonymous ID: afc257 Aug. 12, 2018, 5:37 p.m. No.2576034   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6054 >>6058

>>2575943

 

So where is N449QX listed?

 

Another anon posted the "crash" pix which showed 449QX as part of the wreckage. But the logs here do not show N449QX as being at SEATAC on Friday.

 

WTF?

Anonymous ID: afc257 Aug. 12, 2018, 5:42 p.m. No.2576126   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2575747

 

maybe, maybe not. the pilot knew how to fly close to the ground. and Puget sound is full of islands and other obstacles to hide behind in flight.

 

All we're saying is without a flight track we don't know for sure the plane did what the MSM is claiming nor are we even sure there was a pilot on board.

 

keep digging planefags