Anonymous ID: beab54 Aug. 12, 2018, 5:21 p.m. No.2575829   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5934 >>5936

>>2575681

I hear you guys loud and clear.

The current finds corroborate what I've found out and reported a (half a) dozen breads back, I lost count. Much of my report was unsauced and I haven't found anything solid yet.

Are we on solid ground for the plane ID and call sign? I ask because as with other FFs and clown tomfoolery there is more often than not confusion about such things. Take for instance MH-17 (hey, 17!) where plane ID is notoriously questionable if you dig some.

And I don't buy the official story for 1ç.

For one, we need our own anon eyes on the ground. Someone with technical insight and a healthy dose of autism. Like flight 93 (was it?) where there wasn't even remains of a corresponding plane to be found on impact site. Pentagon, same story. Can't be done. We know. So this is a call to local anon-photofags to go and fill in some blanks for us, be our eyes if you will.

Anonymous ID: beab54 Aug. 12, 2018, 5:41 p.m. No.2576113   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2575936

>>2575934

Whole thing remains sketchy as ever .

Haven't seen anything except some smoke from a hole in the trees.

Overloads my bullshit detector once again.

I will remain on the lookout to see how this spins out later on.

ie. wreckage identification, reconstruction (as per usual after crashes).