Good job, NewBaker.
Lurking Baker in the House
Looks like you're doing a great job. I'll just sit here and feel comfy.
NewBaker
I suggest you go ahead and retire the 3247 notables to the "previous notables" area. You are
running short of room for this bread's notables.
Of course, it is your call. Just a suggestion from an experienced baker.
See attached. You may also want to delete the bottom line or two from "Previous Notables," but that's a judgment call.
Anon, you cannot just say, "Fix it." Baker's are busy. Say:
(Example Link) (Example Label)
Delete above
(New Link) (New Label)
Change to this
This makes the baker's job much easier, and you get what you feel is correct. If you're wrong,
don't worry… many anons will step in to correct your corrections.
Congratulations, Baker!
Usually, you have to bake several breads before anons start complaining about your bakes. You
have now graduated to "AmateurBaker" due to the many anons biotching about your bake.
Now, if you can get one to call you "compedBaker" or "shillBaker" you will become
a "VeteranBaker." If you bake, you need to have a thick skin. Trust me, just ignore those
who complain. Do your best, and admit your mistakes when you make them.
You're doing great, AmateurBaker.
For a first bake, this one was great. So, he fucked up a title or two. At least the formatting was
correct. Most first bakers have dead links, bad links, or just shitty bakes. This one was at least a B+
Ask me after the mid-terms. If the Dems gain the House, then Q is a LARP. Q said mid-terms are safe.
That's also the most important test of the WH vs the Cabal. If GOP loses the House, all hope
is lost.
Sauce with the original photo including link where you got it from. Otherwise, I'm calling Bullshit.
No. I said that this will disprove Q. It is a matter of timing when to release enough to secure the
mid-terms. If the Dems win, then Q is a LARP. That does not mean I believe it. It isn't like God,
where asking for proof is a sign of disbelief. I maintain the possibility that Q is a LARP. That
does not mean I believe it or that I'm on the fence.
I admit it as a possibility, and I have given my (current) criterion that would disprove. Winning
the midterms is not necessarily proof. Do you see the mathematical/logical premise I am
alluding to?