>>2587970 (last bread)

>Hey Q, when can we expect a Tracy Beanz tweet post from you? I think that’s the next logical step in these useless posts.

So you think the satanic pedophile and UFO researcher (!!!) Jordan Sather references were useless? When does Q post useless stuff, except when to bait with very transparent tripcode "funny business"?

>>2588186

Obviously the satanic pedophiles and Jordan Sather are two different things, that sentence was badly formed kek