>>2591794 lb
AGREED^^^^^^^^^
People add red Notable within seconds of a post,
not even looking up the link, reading the article or checking for dates, source, etc.
IT'S BULLSHIT. You are right, anons were/are better than this.
An example is the Bernie post with ONLY a link. NO article, just a link.
WITHIN SECONDS someone red Notables it.
I remember people reporting on gmails before or at the time Q mentioned it.
People need to do some digging BEFORE claiming it was not known.
Q proof needs more digging to confirm reports never talked about the gmail/primate emails before Q
Thank you. this is the point I was trying to make to the knuckleheads.
Impatient anons jumping before digging.
Bullshit.
We found one article where Comey testified about using gmail on June 14th, and digging hasn't even looked into it further yet.
How is just connecting it of any significance?
If Q mentioned it before testimony or reports THEN IT WOULD BE SIGNIFICANT.
Digging needs to be done.
June 14th article has already been found easily.
Q proof is NOT proved yet.
Why the impatience of anons?
We need to confirm when it was in the public eye first.
That Tom Steyer ad and walnut sauce IS OLD OLD NEWS.
Digs haven't even begun yet, this one just first noticed.
So why am I in charge of proving this? I didn't make the side by side making it look like Q just talks about stuff already known.
Who even started this and was pushing it without working on it needs to clear it up.
I have been digging, making notables and twitting for 12 hours now.
So if the page strzok emails were out before that or reporters were already reporting private emails.
Then Q just read the news like us and put it in a drop.
Is that what you are going for?
What is significant about that?
Punked or not - I just try and keep an eye on Notables.
Being a digger, it is frustrating to see pure crap in Notables.
It causes confusion and slides after people read them.
It seems to have gotten worse day after day with newbies and shills pushing impatiently.
Like they get a gold star if they get a fucking notable.
BAKER - You have been asked by quite a few anons to take out the Q crap "being proofed".
That anon can complete his work and submit it when and IF it is ever a proof.
You just add to confusion by keeping it in.
Do you not have enough Notables?
I don't even dig or post any digs during last night Baker, who is horrible at Notables.
*late night
Typical late night baker. Every night produces crap notables from a certain late baker.
Refuses to listen to multiple anons..
Would you like to add some songs and blogs too?