"private email" proof, anons. Understandable?
Some others
Bruh, your article is the 26th of january, first drop is 19th - whatchu talkin bout?
Well, the article he mentioned is 7 days after the 19th.
I suppose it depends on if that story broke before Jan 19th? Anyone know?
I appreciate the feedback - bruh also, if I'm spending time on proofs, them shits gotta be good. I don't remember when the news broke, but I couldn't find an article predating 1/19/18 that mentions "private" anything - NOT just the texts themselves
Personal** not private.
Anons, I'm using a new format for Q proofs, and I'm tired of all the red lines - will redo the most solid ones first but here's a taste.
Sup, I'm making a shit ton more anyways, that one wasn't strong. We need the GOOD proofs to be pretty. Here's my work so far tonight.
No worries, critical feedback is exactly why I post here before the proofs thread. I'm just good at making things look pretty and need critique.