Anonymous ID: 83d316 Aug. 14, 2018, 12:47 a.m. No.2593222   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2593166

Jfc, so Q is not allowed to talk about anything that's been mentioned before?

 

And Q talking about things that have been mentioned before and are being mentioned again is discrediting EVERYTHING if we talk about it or it gets added to Q proofs.

 

This kind of incompetent meaningless faggotry leads to infinitely more faggotry every time it's introduced. Because it's an attempt to control narratives based on faggotry.

 

Yes. Q and Hannity and JW are constantly talking about things anons have suspected and have been trying to prove for YEARS. And this is progress. And the super astute anons who conveniently show up coincidentally to curate these things away from the news cycle for the sake of everyone else's credibility are suspicious as fuck.

Anonymous ID: 83d316 Aug. 14, 2018, 12:51 a.m. No.2593239   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3246

>>2593233

Dude, is it on you to be the end all curator of proofs? Do you want it to be on you?

 

If the self vetting of information is not a fundamental practice of this board, what is the point?

Anonymous ID: 83d316 Aug. 14, 2018, 12:56 a.m. No.2593259   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2593246

Everyone has to give a shit. Themselves.

 

Struggling for an end all authority on truth just leads to fake authorities.

 

"If, on your path, you encounter the Buddha . . ."