that and lame "oh noes the absolute state of this board, let me lament the days of yonder and sing the song of our golden hours"
ok, not even buying that they're joking anymore: the sheer amount of baby jokes/baby eating jokes just smokes out any and all humor.
at the very least this is normalizing, or somfin
RIP that scientist who was scalped for a hawaiian shirt
>If you don't trust Q when he says to trust Sessions, maybe you should lurk moar or go back…
or just leave the February shills back where they came from
anon last night had a good Learn our comms hunch about
Smile for the Camera.
and
demon & demon wife's SMILES scams
not sure if much came out of it
>The information is already out there.
-things that you know
-things that you don't know
-things that you don't know that you don't know
welp, you are engaging the subject.
just wanted to help along the way to your liberation from gender shackles…
> splattering tits and ass on a research board.
this thing called shills, there is.
do remember that.
>Still doesn't change the issue.Why go through all the circle jerk motions of totally separate legal paths for introducing evidence?
how do you prepare for a picnic if you don't know how fare you'll go? do you bring along the same things for a walk in the park or trip to the antarctic?
oh, by the way.
like many my age, i grew up drowned in movies and books about holocaust guilt.
wept at MAUS, Schindler's list, etc.
one day i hear of this thing called "negationists"… weird, eh?
but the weirdest thing is these guys are brutally outlawed, outcast, and intensely shunned.
Um, ok, sure, i can see why - emotionally - but, legally? wtf?
it makes no sense at all, if they're wrong.
so… are they?
i wouldn't have thought so, but the logic is unavoidable.
expressing one's love for being gaggged and bound and walked in the street like a dog = progressive and good
expressing one's love for titties = evil
gotcha
the point eludes you still, it seems.
you're still thinking of a single containable prosecution event
ohyeah.
that story smells.
the way it's told/brought up/marketed, the whole thing.
seen those patterns before
>Because you are talking in parables instead of getting to the point.
excuse me for thinking an anon on qresearch would be able to think/understand.
won't be playing with you anymore: re-read for (yet another) chance.
re-read crumbs.
this is bigger than you can imagine.
that's why