>>2595886

Your insistence that unsauced, pure anon speculation that this board has overwhelmingly said time and again should never be in notables just goes to prove what a shill baker you are.

Has 0 to do with anything else you claim as a prejudice.

Add the fact that you continue to insult me when I have not done the same further proves to anons what a faggot you really are. This is why I am a proponent of avatar bakers.

I'm no longer engaging with you're faggotry. I hope you have a really bad day.

>>2596015

idk lawfag, pros but on a pretty good case. Lots of sauce. I would convict if I were a jurist.

>>2596195

tax fraud and money laundering. Prosecution showed how he kept the money out of the US to avoid paying taxes. He had a luxurious lifestyle until the money dried up. Then attempted to fraud banks to borrow money. If Manafort's email to JK is in the evidence, it's overwhelming proof he attempted to bribe bank officials to get money.

Either way, time will tell.

No Aquittal

>>2596365

She didn't get shit canned. She resigned.

>>2596434

I disagree with lawfag. It's just speculation because we don't know what went on behind closed doors.

>>2596444

>>2596444

The judge ordered no cameras anon

>>2596456

You add shit post with no verificatioin but won't add GMTgraphicsAnon links without verification?

We need a new baker. This one is the shits.

>>2596493

and still adding speculation to notes.

SMDH

>>2596494

I don't think it's because of the noise. There are many things about this case that are sealed. He would not even allow reporters to text while in court.

>>2596508

The speculation now is Manafort will appeal if convicted that Mueller didn't have the jurisdiction to go after Manafort. Which brings on the legality of the Special Counsel.

But that could take years to go thru the system.

>>2596471

Opinons are not notable. I disagree with lawfag for many reasons. Why should he be in notes and not other specualtions?

>>2596545

They already removed the wreckage and the remains.

>>2596568

Nope. You don't play with the judicial system like that anon. He is now either going to be found innocent or guilty. Period. No games.

>>2596577

If I were a jurist, I would convict based on the evidence.