13 delta
condone to condemn
sheit
i second that notion
:51 timestamp also dark to light
fairly [substantial (circumstantial)] proof using the rapid speed of an anon posting to be FIRST to report to the board that the LIGHTS WENT OUT on live tv ((dark to light)) and this was because the
FIRST post by an anon
was 40 seconds in to the :51 timestamp that day
:24 timestamp on this post
sheit
How do you capture a very dangerous animal?
SURROUND IT ?
Do you attack it from the front?
MIGHT WANT TO SURROUND IT FIRST BEFOREHAND ?
Do you walk through the front door?
BUST IN, SUPRISE, RAID ?
Do you signal ahead of time you will be attacking?
NEGATIVE, MIGHT WANT TO CONFUSE/MISLEAD AS WELL
How do you distinguish between good and bad?
YOU DONT, CAUSE CONFUSION ?
PLOT TWIST ?
Who do you trust to keep secrets?
LESS THAN 10 ?
How do you prevent leaks?
COMPARTMENTALIZE ?
Who do you trust to complete the mission?
WE THE PEOPLE ?
ALL SIDES ?
i think this is/was task force
im pretty positve using Robyn Gritz as triangulation from GW taskForce and this article
o7
RIP TaskForce
RIP TaskForce
RIP TaskForce
hypothetically speaking
fact sheit
13 delta
changed from condone to condemn
thoughts
>condone to condemn
is someone gonna flipflop
>13
nothing on that Qproof
far off tangent
-
first thing i thought of was 13 angry democrat
clockfag tangent
-
:13 on the clock - current date is 08/17
this is FIRST [Q to Q] and its word change not spelling so this is new territory
Q can only edit on own board
double checking right now PF for other edits
one prior Q board edit noted
spitballing Q edits
vote
voteR
condONE
condEMN
vote
voter
condone
condemn
then if one is tryin to tie in a lead or such is when i delta so
1 delta
vote to voter
13 delta
condone to condemn
no answers
just questions
laying out the fact sheit