lawfag here
no anon
that means they are confident pros did NOT make case
they will ask judge to rule INNOCENT as a matter of law
if he declines then the believe jury will hand or acquit
NO WAY they produce no case if they think they are cooked
lawfag here
no anon
that means they are confident pros did NOT make case
they will ask judge to rule INNOCENT as a matter of law
if he declines then the believe jury will hand or acquit
NO WAY they produce no case if they think they are cooked
HANG or acquit oops
if no closing argument that is odd indeed
i just read judge declined to rule so it will go to the jury unless there is a deal
mebbe so but if only a count of tax fraud its no big deal
he can spend a few months in club fed and go on with his life or luxury
peruvian marching leaves
lawfag here
i feel educated/experienced opinions are different anon
if you are the poster of "fell on his sword" i do not agree with that - that implies he took one for the team
i do believe he may be taking his lumps like a man and that also explain the tactic if that is what you meant
the counts are just not that serious and he may have a lot to hide