Anonymous ID: 768827 Aug. 14, 2018, 10:46 a.m. No.2596855   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6973 >>6987 >>7018 >>7173 >>7184

>>2596739

>>2596739

>Wall of text crits you for 1,000,000 dmg

I can't even. In the past two breads, I've laid out the Q posts that describe how the Pope is the head of a major trafficking cabal, that reports to the Roths, and how Soros actually reports to the Pope himself. Q was quoted, infographs provided, and background with external links to support some of the claims are all there. And the MSM dedicates their energy to THIS PIECE OF FUCKING TRIPE?

 

Isn't MSNBC the ones that are trying to help people remember how to delete embarrassing tweets? Wonder why they decided to release that piece right now? What's going on, today, that people are being made aware of, that makes all that relevant?

 

>>2313022

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/2312475.html#2313022

 

>>1804576

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1803798.html#1804576

 

>>1793707

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1793004.html#1793707

 

>>1764829

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1764372.html#1764829

 

>>1694734

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1694072.html#1694734

 

>>1169419

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1168695.html#1169419

 

>>894110

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/893472.html#894110

 

>>614610

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/614406.html#614610

 

CHILDREN ANONS

 

MSM is public enemy #1. THEY DON'T WANT US TO KNOW THE TRUTH.

Anonymous ID: 768827 Aug. 14, 2018, 11:27 a.m. No.2597288   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7312

>>2597020

It's because he was attempting to cover up all his crimes. Q said they raided the place to get all the digs on his administration.

 

>>2597184

Q is real, and the article is attempting to discredit. That's really all I needed to know. That anon posted once, and it was an attempt to discredit Q. I bet you, dollars to donuts, the poster works at MSNBC.

>by Brandy Zadrozny and Ben Collins

Anonymous ID: 768827 Aug. 14, 2018, 11:32 a.m. No.2597350   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7357

>>2596993

It's a hit piece, anon. They are out in front trying to discredit. That article was not meant to be flattering.

 

>>2596973

I was just pointing out that what we do here is more along the lines of journalistic integrity than the actual goons that get paid to do it. Not attempting to have a final word on anything; just drawing a comparison. Aside from that, shills started showing up and attacking with baseless lies. Notice how they backed off that claim and shifted "arguments".

>>2597040