Anonymous ID: 92a6c8 Aug. 14, 2018, 2:06 p.m. No.2599350   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2599270

I rarely make the time to consume info that's in video form, but yes that is one hypothesis that's on the table, in my mind. And if that's what happened, we probably will never find out, as it would likely remain a national security secret.

Anonymous ID: 92a6c8 Aug. 14, 2018, 2:35 p.m. No.2599678   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9724 >>9750

>>2599632

Yep, anons dug extensively on that on Sat. Aug 11. USS Russell was not scrapped. It was "stored" until, I believe, 2011 (someone verify the date, don't take my word for it) and then it was "scrapped". One anon thinks classified parts might have been removed and replacement (equally classified) parts provided by the deep-state rogue faction of the CIA substituted. Or that a fake USS Russell was substituted somehow for scrapping, while the rogue-CIA-faction got ahold of the real USS Russell. Another idea is that the launch tubes from the sub were installed somewhere (on the island perhaps?) and rogue-CIA launched missiles from them?

These and other possibilities have been probed quite a bit by anons.

You're onto something!

Anonymous ID: 92a6c8 Aug. 14, 2018, 2:39 p.m. No.2599718   🗄️.is 🔗kun

I suppose you mean well, but "Catechism" means Catholic doctrine made up by Catholic priests and Catholic scholars.

 

One can look to the Bible to understand what is meant by the Body of Christ.

Anonymous ID: 92a6c8 Aug. 14, 2018, 2:45 p.m. No.2599799   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9819 >>9839

>>2599750

There was or is a rogue sub.

Q said so.

I do not know its status.

There has been speculation that the missile fired near the projected path of AF1 to the Singapore summit from near Whidbey Island, WA, was fired by a rogue submarine.

It is logical to look for possible evidence of a rogue submarine, even if we are not sure one way or the other.

The hypothesis has not been refuted, nor has it been proven.

It is not illogical to try to ascertain evidence either for or against a hypothesis.