>>2601558

1 Take heed that ye do not your alms before men, to be seen of them: otherwise ye have no reward of your Father which is in heaven.

2 Therefore when thou doest [thine] alms, do not sound a trumpet before thee, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may have glory of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.

3 But when thou doest alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth:

4 That thine alms may be in secret: and thy Father which seeth in secret himself shall reward thee openly.

>>2601731

The answer to MOS is still in dispute.

It may be Mossad.

It may be the other.

You have no confirmation.

When Q gives you confirmation you will be correct.

Until then, it's just like your opinion man

>>2601777

That is a check in the corner of your theory.

Remember, Q confirmed that

Q

Q

was an error.

If Q confirms MOS = Mossad then you will be proven correct.

Until then, it is a hypothesis.

>>2601954

I anxiously await your digs.

My concern is that jumping to the conclusion that MOS = Mossad could divide anons.

If Q confirms then I will give the theory (Mossad) my full consideration.

But the weak attempt at bullying anons is laughable.

We don't roll like that.

>>2602014