>>2602751

I 'like' the Mossad theory but we should do ACH (analysis of competing hypotheses).

The MOS controlling US Politicians would seem to be a deal killer for the Media Object Server theory, except for the possibility of AP News controlling elections.

What if Mockingbird and 'Soros election fraud' or some other layer of fraud are conducted on the same servers?

I don't think we should discard that hypothesis.

The way you discard hypotheses is to find evidence that makes them unlikely (not confirming evidence, though that is nice – but subject to the enemy, confirmation bias).

>>2604513

Yes. Search for books with keywords 'Structured Analysis' and 'Tradecraft'.

Abduction -Deduction -> Induction is a description of the Scientific Method.

>>2604495

So the primary negative for the Media Object Server is that it doesn't seem to fit communicating with US Politicians well.

Best counter argument so far: the 'control' is via elections using AP news reporting somehow.

The primary disconfirming aspect of MOS = MOSSAD here is that the CIA is moar plausible. A counter answer is that the CIA has been penetrated by the Mossad since the Angleton era.

Mild confirmation of MOSSAD: they received 'raw unmasked data' in the context of Obama's Daily Presidential Briefing. 'Raw' in this context means both metadata and data on every intercept – so we know foreign nationals and an FIS were getting full data on intercepts of US Persons. This is highly illegal at several levels.

Ergo, the MOSSAD is part of this scandal, no matter how you parse MOS.

Also, don't forget that Amdocs has controlled US Cellular 'gateways' (including geolocation/911) for donkies years now.

>>2604710

That's a really great question, along with, if the MB and Obama are radical Sunnis, what are they doing suporting Hezbollah, and Iran (Shiites).

There's some deep f*ckery there fo shizzle.