>>2616146

1. NDA was from before administration (campaign, not in WH, though the contract did stipulate "at any time" i.e., future: no bad-mouthing Trump family)

2. She's not "communicating with Congress" she (ghost-) wrote a trashy book

3. She broke a CONTRACT

>these people are so stupid it hurts

>>2616245

They can't explain how it is STILL GOING ON, can they?

>>2616359

VERY GOOD CATCH - will add to spreadsheet

Aaaand…

You don't have to break links here and you can get around the archive ban on most sites by using archive.org, and you don't need that shit after html

GOOD LINK:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/nsa-cia-other-intelligence-agencies-target-online-games-reports-say/2013/12/09/dc4cf9d4-60e0-11e3-94ad-004fefa61ee6_story.html

ARCHIVE:

https://web.archive.org/web/20151111163935/https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/nsa-cia-other-intelligence-agencies-target-online-games-reports-say/2013/12/09/dc4cf9d4-60e0-11e3-94ad-004fefa61ee6_story.html

t.archivefag :D

>>2616462

You cannot convince any of them, it is hopeless and futile. They don't want to know (history or understanding), they can't let it go, and they will fite you, as useless as that is.

seems timely

>>2616637

And what did they think was going to happen? They have no license, they are pirate. Are we supposed to be outraged or feel sorry for them?

WTF, use logic. They chose to go with no license…