>>2622370

Oh come to fuck on, at least do a cursory dig before fucking calling something legit

If ABSOLUTELY nothing else, at least click around a little bit and see what else is posted. Fucking seriously? You honestly buy that a 'US Agency or Dept' of any sort at all would have allowed negative posts about Hussein in 2012?

/sigh

we are in the idiocracy, it's official.

>>2622676

just as often, it's because we're closing in too close on something that's not actually ready to be revealed yet in the plan.

>>2622676

>>2622761

Also, it 'outs' shills quite effectively as well.

Then there's the possibility that there may be a need to push a 'crazy' narrative back into the MSM - potentially to encourage some stupid WH press pool hack to finally 'ask the question'

>>2622808

its' because until there's actual sauce to back it up, it's a fake and a slide.

That picture 'could' be just as it's being peddled about - a victim of child torture.

But it could just as easily be an autopsy/accident scene pic of some poor kid not wearing a seat belt that got vivisected by the wind shield.

So how about 'not' spreading about fake shit without a source and solid info to prove it is what it's being claimed to be?

That is of course if you like being a credible information source. If not, well, CNN would like to speak with you.

>>2622839

it's a fake - and your reaction is precisely the intent.

>>2622910

and a shill is a shill.