>>2614075 >>2614100

>>2614107 >>2614108

>>2614143 >>2614290

>>2614317 all old bread

1. Has Q actually said, much more trumpeted, "the fake bin Laden killing"?

1. Noted that you did stipulate "if". Fair enough.

3, How long did it take to locate UBL?

1. How long did it take to kill UBL?

1. How many times were stand down orders given?

1. Given under which Admin?

Implied, perhaps, is the setup of a series of deceptions leading up to the 2012 re-election campaign of Hussein.

Plausible? GWB needed an active on-the-run enemy to personify the war on terror?

Plausible? Hussein needed a result that fit his Iraq war bad Afghan war good theme? Just in time?

How to confirm the death of Bin Laden? Place and time of death? Killer(s)?

Who can you trust? Is this a test of Q in the view of Anons here?

How to resolve to your satisfaction, for now, and for long term?

>>2623423

Hmm. Please, go a step farther. The distinction is between something that is the central part of an item and something that is an augmentation, add-on, aux, optional?

Might it also be a matter of complementarity? That is, completion of the whole? To use a word from your post re the side-by, a matter of match-making?

What is the typical symbolism of adding a charm to an item? Of hanging something around one's neck? It may be very ancient, such a practice, renewed here in what Q is illustrating for us.

>>2623585

Both complaint, consideration, and remedy may have already been undertaken. How would we know of such things, given secrecy of the FISA system?

I think you raised something here that may well become another Boom down the road: accountability of judges, at least FISA judges. One might expect accountability to reach the Chief of Supremes as member of constitutionally created branch of government. FISA seems almost extra-constitutional, when one considers it that way, yes? Outside the bounds.